Legal Opinion
Smith v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1976No. Civ. 36988PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for writ,' of mandamus to direct respondent Regents of the University of California, to set aside the layoff of appellant, Leon Smith, to reinstate him, and to pay back salary.
I
Appellant’s first contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in applying the substantial evidence test in reviewing the proceedings before the Personnel Appeals Committee. He argues that the trend of the law, as evidenced by the holdings of the California Supreme Court in Bixby v. Pierno, 4 Cal.3d 130 [93 Cal.Rptr. 234, 481 P.2d 242],…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. CHE, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Apte v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Coleman v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Barnes v. Personnel DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.