Legal Opinion

Finbury v. Architectural Heritage Foundation, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 19, 2007No. 072416BLS2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

INTRODUCTION

This action presents a contract dispute involving real estate development. The plaintiffs, Elaine Finbury and Rufus Choate Associates, a limited partnership, bring claims of breach of contract, fraud, promissoiy estoppel, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, quantum meruit, and violation of G.L.c. 93A against the defendants, Architectural Heritage Foundation, Inc. (“Architectural” or “AHF”), and its president Sean McDonnell. Before the Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Schaer v. Brandeis UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. George v. Synkinetics, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2013
  2. Rodden v. Savin Hill Enterprises, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API