Legal Opinion

Rodden v. Savin Hill Enterprises, LLC

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 21, 2016No. SUCV201503194CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Gordon, Robert B., J.

BACKGROUND1

This case arises out of a failed employment relationship. Plaintiff William Rodden (“Rodden” or the “plaintiff’) alleges that defendants Savin Hill Enterprises d/b/a Savin Hill Specialties (“Savin Hill”) and two of its corporate agents, Karen Diep (“Diep”) and Mateo Van (“Van”), induced him to leave purportedly secure employment at John Dewar & Company (“Dewar”) to come to work for Savin Hill as the General Manager of its new retail establishment. According to Rodden, the defendants desired to acquire his distinctive knowledge, expertise and industry…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API