Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Orcutt v. Instantwhip Denver, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 22, 1971No. 23867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lee

This writ of error is directed to a judgment of the Denver District Court denying plaintiff’s application for a permanent injunction restraining defendant, Instant-whip Denver, Inc., from selling or offering for sale within the state of Colorado “Instantwhip’s Dressing,” “Jim’s Dressing,” and “Dressing,” food products manufactured by defendant and sold at wholesale to restaurants and institutions such as hospitals. The complaint alleges that the above food products are “filled dairy products,” the manufacture and sale of which within the state of Colorado is prohibited by C.R.S. 1963, 7-6-25…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. The People v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. ShackelfordColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. 4-D Brothers, Inc. v. HeckersColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Strehlow v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API