Legal Opinion
Strehlow v. Kansas State Board of Agriculture
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 14, 1983No. 54,466PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Holmes, J.:
This is an appeal by the defendant, Kansas State Board of Agriculture (KSBA or the Board) from an order of the district court holding the provisions of the Kansas filled dairy products act (FDPA), K.S.A. 65-725 et seq. unconstitutional as applied to a product marketed by the plaintiffs. The facts are not in dispute and will be greatly summarized herein.
The plaintiffs, Dr. Chester H. Strehlow, and his wife, Mary L. Strehlow, are co-zone directors for Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., a foreign corporation, in the sale and distribution of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Iola State Bank v. BolanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- City of Lenexa v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Ron Henry Ford, Lincoln, Mercury v. Nat'l U. FireCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Vap v. Diamond Oil Producers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.