United States v. Cherer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TRAGER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
TRAGER, District Judge:
Paris Cherer was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) for attempting to persuade, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexual acts with him. He appeals his conviction on two grounds. First, that the district court committed prejudicial error by improperly instructing the jury, and second, that the district court improperly admitted evidence of his past conviction and other prior bad acts under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). He also appeals *1153his sentence of 293 months on the grounds that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BlinkinsopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PelisamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.