Legal Opinion

American Exchange Bank v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1933No. 24556. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of the vendor, brought this action to recover the balance of the purchase price due under a contract for the sale of an automobile. The defendants set up, by way of affirmative defense, certain alleged fraudulent representations made to them by the vendor, inducing them to enter into the contract, and prayed for rescission. From a judgment entered on findings favorable to plaintiff, defendants appeal.

The contract of sale was dated April 6,1931, but was actually executed April 8th. The appellants, however, had taken possession of the car on April 5th, and had paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Pitcher v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  3. Burnley v. ShinnWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Noel v. Garford Motor Truck Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API