Sprintcom, Inc. v. PUERTO RICO REGULATIONS AND PERMITS ADMINISTRATION
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERAS, Senior District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendant Puer-to Rico Regulations and Permits Administration’s (“Defendant” or “ARPE”) Motion to Dismiss (No. 9) and Plaintiff SPRINT-COM, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Sprint”) response thereto (No. 14). In its Complaint, Plaintiff Sprint brings suit against Defendants ARPE and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for Defendants’ decision to deny Sprint’s application for a preliminary plan approval to install a telecommunications facility on the roof of a three-story building located in the town of Isabela, Puerto Rico. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.