Maulis v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, District Judge.
The question submitted in this case is as to whether or not a disagreement exists between the plaintiff and the United States Veterans’ Bureau, as required by section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act 1924, as amended (38 USCA § 445). If there is a disagreement, the court has jurisdiction further to proceed. If there is no disagreement, then a jurisdictional fact is lacking.
The matter is submitted upon the motion of the defendant to dismiss and a stipulation of fact. For the purpose of passing upon this motion, the court adopts the stipulation of facts filed herein as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Stevenson v. FainSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932
- Bigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934