Legal Opinion

Maulis v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 17, 1931No. 39272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, District Judge.

The question submitted in this case is as to whether or not a disagreement exists between the plaintiff and the United States Veterans’ Bureau, as required by section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act 1924, as amended (38 USCA § 445). If there is a disagreement, the court has jurisdiction further to proceed. If there is no disagreement, then a jurisdictional fact is lacking.

The matter is submitted upon the motion of the defendant to dismiss and a stipulation of fact. For the purpose of passing upon this motion, the court adopts the stipulation of facts filed herein as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Stevenson v. FainSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932
  3. Bigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API