Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martinson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1987No. 02001PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

The Commonwealth has taken this appeal from an order which granted appellee’s motion to suppress, 1 and argues that the hearing court erred when it directed the suppression of evidence discovered by police officers during an inventory search of a motor vehicle in their custody. We agree and reverse.

Two Philadelphia police officers, on patrol on the Schuylkill Expressway on December 31, 1985, halted a vehicle after they had observed it endanger other vehicles by weaving back and forth in traffic, across the dividing lines, at a slow rate of speed. The vehicle was occupied by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. ReddixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. State v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. GermannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. VasquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. FerrariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API