Commonwealth v. Martinson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
The Commonwealth has taken this appeal from an order which granted appellee’s motion to suppress, 1 and argues that the hearing court erred when it directed the suppression of evidence discovered by police officers during an inventory search of a motor vehicle in their custody. We agree and reverse.
Two Philadelphia police officers, on patrol on the Schuylkill Expressway on December 31, 1985, halted a vehicle after they had observed it endanger other vehicles by weaving back and forth in traffic, across the dividing lines, at a slow rate of speed. The vehicle was occupied by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. ReddixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GermannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. VasquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. FerrariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.