Legal Opinion
State v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 5, 2001No. 00-3440-CR, 00-3476-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANE, C.J.
¶ 1. Adam Matthews and Jeremy Husbeck appeal from a circuit court order denying their motion to dismiss charges against them for shining deer while hunting or possessing a firearm, as parties to a crime. At issue is the State of Wisconsin's authority to regulate the off-reservation, treaty-based hunting rights of two members of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, a Chippewa tribe located in the upper peninsula of Michigan.
¶ 2. It is undisputed that the State can regulate off-reservation, treaty-based hunting rights for conservation purposes, as long as the State establishes that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2011
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2011
- CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF COLVILLE v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2011