Legal Opinion

in Re Solis Law Firm

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 27, 2016No. 13-16-00350-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-16-00350-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE SOLIS LAW FIRM On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides1 Relator Solis Law Firm2 filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to disqualify attorney Marlene Dougherty from representing the real parties in 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. in Re Olshan Foundation Repair Company, LLC and Olshan Foundation Repair Company of Dallas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API