Legal Opinion

Steffler v. Schroeder

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 20, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 N.J. Super. 243 (1951)

79 A.2d 485

LENA STEFFLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RUDOLPH SCHROEDER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LOUISE WINDISCH, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 5, 1951.

Decided February 20, 1951.

Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Henry J. Camby, attorney for and of counsel with appellant.

Mr. Samuel M. Friedman argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Brand & Sciorsci, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.A.D.

Plaintiff's action was brought to recover for services…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Disbrow v. DurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  2. Stone v. ToddSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  3. Hoey v. DellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Rowland v. RowlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
  5. Schmetzer v. BroeglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. DiamondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Deskovick v. PorzioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Slovak Catholic Sokol v. FotiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Farber v. MargolinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API