Legal Opinion

Burson v. Adamson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1930No. 12,297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In his complaint the plaintiff Burson designates his action as one to recover damages for losses hy him sustained as the result of the fraud, deceit and conversion of his property by the defendants. The original complaint contains three separate causes of action for the one wrong. The gist of plaintiff’s grievance is that the defendant Adamson, then president of the Metropolitan State Bank of Denver, and the defendant Groff, who in some way was interested in the bank, in which plaintiff was a depositor, having gained the confidence of the plaintiff represented to him that large profits were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County Commissioners v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. Erisman v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Hayden v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Hamer v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Mayhew v. GlazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. MontoyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Kinsey v. PreesonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Ireland v. WynkoopColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Abbott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Burson v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API