Ackerman v. Exxonmobil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in the judgmentDuncan, Circuit Judge
I admire the majority’s deft circumnavigation of serious errors of fact and law in pursuit of an ultimately defensible result. I write separately because the district court’s errors were so many and of such significance that I cannot share the majority’s confidence that they did not contribute to that result. More importantly, I believe that leaving those errors not only unaddressed but unacknowledged will allow, if not encourage, their repetition.
My fundamental concern with the majority’s opinion is that in its magnanimity to a profoundly flawed disposition below, it omits critical facts at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.