State v. Woody
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
Relying upon State v. Pike, 273 N.C. 102, 159 S.E. 2d 334, the defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to conduct a voir dire examination to determine the legality of the defendant’s arrest when the defendant objected to the arresting officer’s testifying as to what he found upon the defendant’s person, no reason for such objection having been stated. This assignment of error is without merit.
The question to which the objection was made was, “What did you find on his person?” Prior to this question, the officer had testified, without objection, that the clerk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.