Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Pinter
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1986No. 84-1970PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal Pinter1 urges that his liability under section 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77/(1), and article 33 A(l) of the Texas Securities Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 581-33 A(l) (Vernon Supp. 1986), should be diminished by plaintiff Maurice Dahl’s wrongful conduct. We disagree with this contention and affirm the decision of the district court granting judgment for plaintiffs.
I
This controversy arises out of the sale of unregistered securities (fractional undivided interests in oil and gas leases) by Pinter to Dahl and to Dahl’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,567 Edmond G. Pharo v. W. L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Ryder International Corporation, a Corporation v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 W. Monroe Stephenson v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. And James E. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Benjamin Rothberg v. Sanford Rosenbloom and Sanford Rosenbloom as of the Estate of David B. Rosenbloom, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.