WALTER KASSUBA, INC. v. Bauch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Each party contends that as a matter of law the contract must be construed in its favor.
At the outset we note that defendant’s affidavit contains recitations of the pleadings and ultimate facts. This does not meet the requirement that affidavits in support of a motion for summary judgment shall state evidentiary facts. Sec. 270.635, Stats. See Weber v. Hurley (1961), 13 Wis. 2d 560, 109 N. W. 2d 65, and McChain v. Fond du Lac (1959), 7 Wis. 2d 286, 96 N. W. 2d 607. Consequently, this court cannot affirm the judg ment of the trial court unless the listing contract can be construed as a matter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Dottai v. AltenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Weber v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Hopper v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Tri-Tech Corp. of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.