Legal Opinion
Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 2015No. 2013AP001532PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
¶ 1. This is a *704review of a published decision of the court of appeals.1 The sole question presented is whether Ash Park, LLC (the seller of a parcel of vacant land) is liable to pay a broker's commission to Re/Max Select, LLC (the broker for the land).
¶ 2. The one-party listing contract between Ash Park and Re/Max provides in relevant part that Ash Park shall pay a broker's commission to Re/Max if Ash Park enters into an "enforceable contract" for the sale of the land. Ash Park entered into a contract for the sale of the land with Alexander & Bishop, Ltd. Whether Re/Max is entitled to a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Maryland Arms Ltd. Partnership v. ConnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Huml v. VlaznyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Taft Parsons, Jr. v. Associated Banc-CorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Thomas Mervyn v. Atlas Van Lines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Wis. Freeze Dried LLC v. Redline Chambers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Joan C. Pulkkila v. James M. PulkkilaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Alpha Insulation & Water Proofing, Inc. v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.