Legal Opinion

State v. Dilts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1977No. 76-0883, CA 6633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree and attempted sodomy in the first degree. On appeal, defendant assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to grant his request that a jury instruction on sexual abuse in the second degree be given.

Defendant argues that, under State v. Washington, 273 Or 829, 543 P2d 1058 (1975), the instruction should have been given because sexual abuse in the second degree is a lesser included offense within the statutory definitions of rape and sodomy. Washington held that a requested instruction on an offense must be given if the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bogle v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. KetchumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API