Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 27, 2002No. CR96639; A112157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his convictions for two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and eight counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He assigns error to the trial court instructing the jury that first-degree sexual abuse is a lesser-included offense of first-degree sodomy. The state concedes that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that first-degree sexual abuse is a lesser-included offense of first-degree sodomy. We accept the state’s concession. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

At the time of the trial, State v. Dilts, 28 Or App 393, 396, 559 P2d 1326 (1977),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. DiltsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. BurgertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API