Legal Opinion
Amfac, Inc. v. Garcia-Maciel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 30, 1989No. 86-07831, 86-07830; CA A49398 (Control); 86-11196; CA A49399; 86-03489; CA A49400; 86-07590; CA A49401PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioners are attorneys. They seek review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of their requests for approval of “client-paid” attorney fees in four Board proceedings 1 in which petitioners represented employers or self-employed insurers. See ORS 656.388(1). The Board based the denial on petitioners’ failure to file their requests within 15 days after the last brief was filed in each of the proceedings. OAR 438-15-027(1)(d) provides:
“A statement of services for proceedings on Board review of a referee’s order shall be filed within 15 days after the filing of the last brief to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greenslitt v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Gooderham v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Davis v. Aetna Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Schwabe v. Workers' Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- LaDelle v. Life Care CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.