Legal Opinion
Quattlebaum v. Kelly
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1994No. 92-CV-504PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment and granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants’ principal contention on appeal in this class action lawsuit1 for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief is that appellees, the District of Columbia and its highest-ranking officials,2 improperly enacted emergency legislation3 effective July 1, 1991, reducing, to October 1,1989 levels, recipients’ entitlement to benefits under Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”).4
The three issues raised on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eleanor H. Montana v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kalaris v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Marion J. Woods, Director of the State Department of Social Services v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quattlebaum v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Quattlebaum v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Quattlebaum v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995