Legal Opinion

Citadel Mall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1994No. 93CA2099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Petitioners, Citadel Mall and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, seek review of an order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) in which the Panel refused to find the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) liable for a portion of the permanent total disability benefits payable to the claimant. We set the order aside and remand with directions.

Claimant, Virginia A. Campbell, sustained an admitted compensable injury in June of 1985, while employed by Citadel Mall, and was awarded temporary total disability benefits. After claimant was subsequently found eligible for vocational…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Excel Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. General Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Culver v. Ace ElectricColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Price Mine Service, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Pacheco v. Roaring Fork AggregatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re JaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API