Legal Opinion
Bruce Loudenslager, Plaintiff v. Hon. Joseph N. Laplante, United States District Judge, et al., Defendants
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided October 4, 2019No. 19-cv-865-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bruce Loudenslager, Plaintiff v. Case No. 19-cv-865-SM Opinion No.
2019 DNH 144
Hon. Joseph N. Laplante, United States District Judge, et al., Defendants O R D E R This matter is before the court sua sponte, for a preliminary review of plaintiff’s complaint. For the reasons discussed, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a viable cause of action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Nevertheless, as provided below, Mr. Loudenslager is granted leave to amend his complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in this order. Discussion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Swan v. BarbadoroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loudenslager v. US District Court-NH, District JudgeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019