Paine v. Copper Belle Mining Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Eirst Judicial District, in and for Pima County. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This is an action by the plaintiffs and appellants, copartners as Paine, Webber & Co., against the defendant, the Copper Belle Mining Company of Arizona, for the recovery of $265,416.72 and interest, upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed and delivered to Duparquet, *408Huot & Moneuse Company and transferred to the plaintiffs. The defendant failed to answer below and is not represented in this court. Prior to the entry of the default of the defendant, one James B. Riley, as a stockholder, filed a petition in intervention, asking leave to defend on behalf of the defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fisher v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Morrow v. Turney's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Garrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Covington v. Basich Bros. Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Eggers v. National Radio Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Duke v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Thelen v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Longoria v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.