Legal Opinion

Holder v. Aultman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1898No. 109PublishedCited by 31 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. This was an action of assumpsit, brought September 21,1894-, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, by Aultman, Miller & Co., a corporation of the State of Ohio, against William Holder, a citizen of the State of Michigan, to recover the price of agricultural machines furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant, and sold'by the defendant, under a…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. This was an action of assumpsit, brought September 21,1894-, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, by Aultman, Miller & Co., a corporation of the State of Ohio, against William Holder, a citizen of the State of Michigan, to recover the price of agricultural machines furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant, and sold'by the defendant, under a contract in writing, the material parts of which were as follows: “This agreement, made this 20th day of February, 1894,.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, by a manufactur ing corporation of the State of Ohio, having its principal office and its factory at Akron in that State, against one of its commission agents, a citizen of Michigan, to recover the price of.agricultural machines sold by the defendant in Michigan under a contract in writing, by which the plaintiff authorized the defendant to sell, within a certain territory in Michigan, such machines supplied to _ him by the plaintiff; and the defendant agreed to canvass the territory, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. McKenna v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1843

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Loeb v. Columbia Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Northwestern Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Dorrance v. DorranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API