State v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This appeal is from a resentencing order entered following the discovery of an error in appellant’s criminal history score. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Appellant Richard Hopkins was charged with first and second degree criminal sexual conduct for engaging in sexual penetration and contact with seven-year-old V.H. over a six-month period. Appellant was also charged with first and second degree criminal sexual conduct for sexual contact with another young victim. Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge of first degree criminal sexual conduct involving Y.H., and a count…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. BeamonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. ChaklosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. HanfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. SaueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.