Legal Opinion
State v. Watkins
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 24, 2002No. C6-01-1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
650 N.W.2d 738 (2002)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
George Cornelius WATKINS, Appellant.
No. C6-01-1877.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
September 24, 2002.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Amy Klobuchar, Hennepin County Attorney, Michael K. Walz, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Lawrence W. Pry, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, HALBROOKS, Judge, and PARKER, Judge.[*]
O P I N I O N
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant George C. Watkins challenges his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dale v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. ChaklosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RannowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Damon Lamont BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.