State v. Allen

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Carlo W. Allen, appeals from his conviction on one *105count of disorderly conduct after being warned to desist, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. Pursuant to R.C. 2945.71(B)(1), Allen argues that his conviction should be vacated because his right to a speedy trial was violated. We find that Allen was not denied his right to a speedy trial, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} A neighbor filed a criminal complaint against Allen in Dayton Municipal Court on August 11, 2016, charging him with public indecency in…