Legal Opinion

Hoye v. DAW Forest Products, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1994No. 20267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation ease. We conclude that there is substantial and competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s following findings: (1) the worker is totally and permanently disabled under the odd-lot doctrine; and (2) the worker’s preexisting physical impairment did not constitute a subjective hindrance to employment, one of the elements for apportioning some of the liability to the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF). We also conclude that the Commission did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the worker’s request for attorney fees pursuant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hartley v. Miller-StephanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Troutner v. Traffic Control CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gooby v. Lake Shore Management Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tarbet v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hoskins v. Circle a Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. ASARCO, INC. v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API