Legal Opinion

ASARCO, INC. v. Industrial Special Indemnity Fund

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1996No. 21622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case. The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s (the Commission) finding that ASARCO, Inc. (ASARCO) failed to show sufficient evidence to place liability on the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (I.S.I.F.) for an employee’s alleged permanent physical impairment, pursuant to I.C. § 72-332. ASARCO has not challenged the Commission’s determination, that Marvin J. Wagar (Wagar), an employee of ASARCO, was rendered totally and permanently disabled in the course…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Langley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Reiher v. American Fine FoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sprague v. Caldwell Transportation Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dehlbom v. STATE, INDUS. SPECIAL INDEMN. FUNDIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Duncan v. Navajo TruckingIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Toelcke v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API