Legal Opinion

Ring Const. Corporation v. Secretary of War of United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 7, 1949No. 9976PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

This case arose under the wartime Renegotiation Act. 1 On December 20, 1943, the Under Secretary of War unilaterally determined that Ring Construction Corporation had realized excessive profits in the sum of $1,365,000 from the performance of contracts for the construction of certain buildings at Camp McCoy, Wisconsin, after which Ring petitioned the Tax Court of the United States for a redetermination. Following a hearing de novo, the Tax Court found excessive profits in the sum of $1,208,965.13. Ring Construction Corporation has petitioned us to review that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Hepburn v. GriswoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. United States v. Bonnell Bonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Stimson, Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Bass v. StimsonUnited States Tax Court · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API