Legal Opinion

State v. McKnight

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 18, 2006No. 04-05-00295-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice.

The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s order granting Albert McKnight’s motion for new trial. The trial court granted the motion for new trial based on alleged charge error concerning the lesser included offense of disorderly conduct. The State contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion for new trial because McKnight did not show he was egregiously harmed by the charge error. McKnight asserts a cross-point contending that the trial court erred in submitting disorderly conduct as a lesser included offense of indecent exposure.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Hampton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Gilbert Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  2. State v. McKnightCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. State v. Gilbert Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  4. State v. McKnight, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API