Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Frankel
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This case presents the question: Are the owners of dominant lands which are benefited by a covenant restricting the use of servient land entitled to just compensation because the servient land has been condemned for a public use prohibited by the restriction? Unfortunately we do not reach the question because there is no appealable judgment.
Three declarations executed, acknowledged, and recorded among the land records in 1956 and in 1959 by the then owners of 347.4369 acres of Montgomery County land (the parent tract) imposed restrictive covenants on the parent tract. 1 The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Himes v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Lang v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Harkins v. AugustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Durling v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Planning Board v. MortimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. B. Dixon Evander & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State Highway Administration v. KeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.