Legal Opinion

Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1989No. 58, SEPTEMBER TERM, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

SEPT. TERM, 1988.

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Appellant, the owner of the fee simple estate in property adjacent to that condemned by the appellee, relies on two theories to support this inverse condemnation case. The first submission is that the appellee has taken property of the appellant in the form of the benefit of certain restrictive covenants which had burdened the condemned property. On that theory this action is barred by limitations. Appellant also submits that the appellee’s use of the adjacent property effects a taking of the appellant’s fee simple property, but there is no evidence to support a taking in the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Wietzke v. Chesapeake Conference Ass'n.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API