Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
SEPT. TERM, 1988.
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
Appellant, the owner of the fee simple estate in property adjacent to that condemned by the appellee, relies on two theories to support this inverse condemnation case. The first submission is that the appellee has taken property of the appellant in the form of the benefit of certain restrictive covenants which had burdened the condemned property. On that theory this action is barred by limitations. Appellant also submits that the appellee’s use of the adjacent property effects a taking of the appellant’s fee simple property, but there is no evidence to support a taking in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Wietzke v. Chesapeake Conference Ass'n.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.