Legal Opinion

Cohen v. United Garment Workers

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is an application by 'plaintiffs to enjoin defendants, during the pendency of the action, from issuing certain circulars to plaintiffs’ customers. It is claimed by plaintiffs that, by reason of the circulars sent to their customers, their business has been seriously affected, and irreparable damage will be done unless the continued use of such circulars be restrained. The defendants claim that in the distribution of such circulars no law is being violated by them, and their contention is not without an appearance of authority. It has been held by the Appellate Division of this department…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. Mayor of AlbanyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832
  2. Sinsheimer v. United Garment Workers of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McGuire v. BloomingdaleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maisel v. SigmanNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Typographical Union No. 6New York Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Manker v. Bakers', Confectioners' & Waiters' International Union of America, Local 144New York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API