Legal Opinion

McGuire v. Bloomingdale

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Joseph McG-uire against Lyman Gr. Bloomingdale and others. Plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

The plaintiff seeks to obtain a preliminary injunction pending this action, which shall restrain and enjoin the defendants from running the engines, machinery, and electric-light plant in their premises; also, from running the pneumatic-blower used for the conveying of cash receptacles in tubes to and from the rooms and counters in defendants’ place of business, and also from loading and unloading goods in front of plaintiff’s, premises, and also from allowing their employes to stand in front of plaintiff’s premises. From the papers it appears that the defendants are dry goods merchants,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bronk v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hudson & Delaware Canal Co. v. New-York & Erie Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  3. Bruce v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Doellner v. TynanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
  5. Mapleson v. Del PuenteThe Superior Court of New York City · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giordano v. Dellwood Dairy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cohen v. United Garment WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API