Legal Opinion
Maisel v. Sigman
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
This is an action to set aside a contract made between the plaintiffs and the defendant Joint Board of Cloak, Skirt, Dress and Reefer Makers’ Union, to limit the defendants’ right to strike, for the enforcement of the said contract, and to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of such strike. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are manufacturing jobbers, doing business at No. 500 Seventh avenue, in the city and state of New York, and that their firm, which has been established for thirteen years, is widely known throughout the United States as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bossert v. . DhuyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Dunham v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Mills v. United States Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Walsh v. DwightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- George J. Gallon v. The Lloyd-Thomas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- California State Council of Carpenters v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.