Legal Opinion

Kaminski v. Newton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1989No. Docket 96308PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 10, 1981, Eugene and Geraldine Kaminski filed a medical malpractice complaint against Holy Cross Hospital and Dr. Kenneth Newton. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants’ negligence caused the right foot of Eugene Kaminski (hereafter plaintiff) to become gangrenous, requiring the amputation of the foot. Plaintiffs sought compensation for damages sustained as a result of the loss of plaintiff’s foot.

Following trial, the jury returned a verdict against defendant Newton and in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $75,000 and in favor of plaintiff’s wife in the sum of $1,000. A judgment of no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maddux v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rodgers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Banzhof v. RocheMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Verhoeks v. GillivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Barkman v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Teodorescu v. Bushnell, Gage, Reizen & ByingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hanley v. Mazda Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Velez v. TumaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Vermilya v. Carter Crompton Site Development Contractors, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Grand Blanc Cement Products, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API