Legal Opinion

Velez v. Tuma

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 2009No. Docket 281136PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, P.J.

Defendant appeals as of right a judgment in plaintiffs favor following a jury trial in this medical malpractice action. We affirm.

This action arises from defendant’s alleged failure to timely and properly diagnose and treat the acute vascular insufficiency condition that plaintiff presented with on February 1, 2000, which resulted in her left leg being amputated below the knee on February 13, 2000.

On appeal, defendant first argues that he was entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because plaintiff did not establish proximate cause in this purported “lost opportunity”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Velez v. TumaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dawe v. Dr Reuven Bar-Levav & Associates, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Taylor v. Kent Radiology, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Shivers v. SchmiegeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Riley v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API