Legal Opinion

Pulkrabek v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1988No. C7-87-1881Published

1Opinion of the Court

418 N.W.2d 514 (1988)

Adrian PULKRABEK, Appellant,

v.

Roger JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. C7-87-1881.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 2, 1988.

Review Denied May 4, 1988.

Kenneth F. Johannson, Crookston, for appellant.

Steven J. Cahill, Cahill and Maring, P.A., Moorhead, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and RANDALL and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

In this action for damages caused by a dog bite, appellant Adrian Pulkrabek challenges the sufficiency of the damages awarded him. Respondent Roger Johnson seeks review of the trial court's grant of conditional additur. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Pehrson v. KistnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Jangula v. KlocekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API