Petoskey v. Schmidt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Numerous technical deficiencies in the proceedings are asserted by the plaintiffs as a basis for a new trial. We will consider them seriatim.
I. Use of the Conjunctive in the Verdict.
The first question of the special verdict inquired as to the negligence of “the defendants Robert Schmidt and State Fair Park, Inc.” The plaintiffs contend that the question should have contained the expression “or either of them.” This argument is based upon the plaintiffs’ analysis of the testimony which prompts them to assert that the jury could have found that Mrs. Petoskey’s fall was the result of negligence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Mullen v. Larson-Morgan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Taylor v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Lee v. JunkansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Bobrowski v. HenneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Kungle v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Grunwald v. HalronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Grunwald v. HalronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- James E. Kochanski v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.