Legal Opinion

Metzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1989No. 533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether occupants of a Winnebago motor home are entitled to be paid benefits under the *32Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 for injuries sustained as a result of an explosion which occurred while the vehicle was being used for lodging purposes. The trial court held that no such benefits could be recovered and entered summary judgment in favor of the no-fault insurance carrier. We affirm.

On December 26, 1983, Milton and Rae Jean Metzel, together with their daughter, Alicia, left their home in York, Pennsylvania, for a winter vacation in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Schweitzer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Crusco v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ware v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. McKelvey v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Herr v. GrierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Schoffstall v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. McKelvey v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API