Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Hinshaw

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 27, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This case involves a business known as “Captain Orange” operating in the El Con Shopping Center, Tucson, Arizona.

Appellees, the plaintiffs below, filed a suit in superior court in three counts. Counts I and II of the complaint alleged breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties respectively on the part of the appellants. Count III was for declaratory relief, asking that the court determine the relationship of the parties. Plaintiffs asked for damages and an accounting. The court found that Captain Orange was owned by the appellee Captain Orange of Arizona, Inc., a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Bulova Watch Co. v. Super City Department Stores of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Memphis & Arkansas River Packet Co. v. AgnewTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Town of Acton v. McGarySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Schultz v. HinshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Title Insurance Company Of Minnesota v. American Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API