Legal Opinion

United States v. Reed

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided November 15, 1984No. NMCM 84 3350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have examined the record of trial, the clemency petitions of the appellant and the trial defense counsel, the assignment of error, and the government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

Appellant was convicted by general court-martial, military judge alone, of violating Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886, through a single unauthorized absence extending for slightly less than six years. He was sentenced…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Gammons v. Domestic Loans of Winston-Salem, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976
  3. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. StefusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Wiggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. FrancisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. TunnellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. TunnellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API