Legal Opinion
Wiggins v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1933No. 6918PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals from a conviction on the three counts of an indictment charging three similar violations of section 1114(h) of the Revenue Act of 1926 1 in the years 1926, 1927, and 1928, respectively. A jury trial was waived; by agreement the cause was tried by the court.
1. Defendant’s plea of statute of limitations to- the first two counts was overruled. Thereafter, in United States v. Scharton, 285 U. S. 518, 52 S. Ct. 416, 76 L. Ed. 917 (1932), the three-year period 2 was held applicable in prosecutions under section 1114(b); eoncededly therefore the first count was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. SchartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Cave v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. George D. AndrosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.