Legal Opinion
State v. Heiskell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1996No. 63156-5PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
916 P.2d 366 (1996)
129 Wash.2d 113
The STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger HEISKELL, Petitioner.
No. 63156-5.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued March 5, 1996.
Decided May 9, 1996.
John Ladenburg, Pierce County Prosecutor, Barbara Corey-Boulet and Kathleen Proctor, Deputy County Prosecutors, Tacoma, for petitioner.
Pattie Mhoon, Tacoma, for respondent.
TALMADGE, Justice.
The 1991 Legislature enacted what is now RCW 9A.44.140(4),[1] which permits juveniles convicted of sex offenses to seek waiver of the requirement to register with local law enforcement authorities. Roger Heiskell was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Estate of BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.