Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lake

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The defendant has been found guilty of setting up or promoting a lottery for money or other property of value at Salisbury on September 3, 1943, in violation of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 271, § 7. He excepts (1) to the admission of certain evidence, (2) to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict in his favor, (3) to the refusal of the judge to give certain requested rulings, and (4) to portions of the charge.

The alleged lottery was carried on by means of machines known as “rotary merchandisers” set up in a store called “Sportland” in charge of the defendant. This machine is about four feet…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Globe-DemocratSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. State v. CoatsOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. United States v. David B. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. Club Caravan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API