Legal Opinion

KnightBrook Insurance Co. v. Payless Car Rental System Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 2017No. 15-15998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFYING A QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

KnightBrook Insurance Company and Knight Management Insurance Services, LLC (together, KnightBrook) sued PCR Venture of Phoenix, LLC, a franchisee of Payless Car Rental System, Inc. (together, Payless), for, among other things, equitable indemnification. After a bench trial, the district court awarded KnightBrook $970,000; in so doing, the court applied §§76 and 78 of the Restatement (First) of Restitution. Having heard oral argument on Payless’s appeal, we have concluded that the appeal’s outcome turns on two questions of law: (1)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Webb v. GittlenArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Denny's Inc. v. Avesta Enterprises, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. NAT. FRUIT PRODUCT v. Baltimore & OR Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knightbrook Ins. Co. v. Payless Car Rental Sys., Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  2. Knightbrook v. Payless Car rental/pcr VentureArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Qu, Shu Q. v. Mukasey, Michael B.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API